[sylpheed:35850] Re: Sylpheed
foxtail at gmx.fr
Sat Nov 2 05:25:27 JST 2013
On 01/11/2013 21:15, tristan wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 21:08, cgw993 at aol.com wrote:
>> I am not giving Sylpheed a hard time at all. I would like to know
>> how the
>> licensing concepts work in general.
* The latest version of the GPL, version 3
* What to do if you see a possible GPL violation
* Translations of GPLv2
* GPLv2 Frequently Asked Questions
* The GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2) in other formats:
plain text <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt>, Texinfo
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.tex>, standalone HTML
> i know you are not giving Sylpheed a hard time (:-))
> i was joking..
> your questions are ""légitimate"..most of us have been
> quite shocked by the big spy scam nsa,i just use
> a Freed_ora linux-libre operating system and avoid
> using other systems that do not respect my freedom..
> am no specialist as to gpl and other licenses but if
> most gnu/linux os recommended by the gnu_org & fsf,so
> i guess Sylpheed's respect our freedom.otherwise it would not
> be in the libre_os..
> Linux, as distributed by Linus Torvalds et al, contains non-Free
> i.e., software that does not respect your essential freedoms
> and it induces you to install additional non-Free Software that it
> doesn't contain.
> GNU Linux-libre
> <http://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/index.en.html> is a
> project to maintain and publish 100% Free versions of Linux, removing
> the offending
> Freed-ora is a sub-project that prepares and maintains 100% Free RPMs
> that track Fedora's non-Free kernels.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sylpheed-bounces at sraoss.jp [mailto:sylpheed-bounces at sraoss.jp] On
>> Behalf Of foxtail at gmx.fr
>> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 9:37 AM
>> To: sylpheed at sraoss.jp
>> Subject: [sylpheed:35843] Re: Sylpheed
>> I'd much prefer blasting the NSA to space and let them handle
>> mysterious Pac
>> man invaders than giving a hard time to Sylpheed..
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : sm0oojzz+sylph at fastimap.com
>> Envoyé : 01/11/2013 15:53
>> À : sylpheed at sraoss.jp
>> Objet : [sylpheed:35842] Re: Sylpheed
>> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:47:30 -0700 cgw993 wrote...
>>> I like Sylpheed. My only concern is that some of the code is non
>>> free I
>>> guess. I am hesitant to invest in learning new software unless I know
>>> certain I am not being spied on, that features are not forced on me
>>> whenever the developer feels like. Non free code often can allow this.
>>> Thx for reading. Just wanted to rant about Outlook. Microsoft sucks.
>> If you have concerns about how a developer designs his application,
>> you have
>> the option of designing or refining your own. Find an open source
>> MUA and
>> tweak it to your hearts content. If this is beyond your abilities, I
>> you have to live with what is available to you for **FREE**.
More information about the Sylpheed