[sylpheed:31663] Re: Deleting duplicate messages
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
hiro-y at kcn.ne.jp
Tue Sep 4 10:26:18 JST 2007
Hello,
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:45:49 -0400
Celejar <celejar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 00:55:31 +0200
> Massimiliano Marini <max at linuxtime.it> wrote:
>
> > > I'm having a problem with the 'Delete duplicate messages' menu
> > > option. Often I receive a message (via POP), read it, and then
> > > receive it again (through a different POP account). When I do
> > > 'Delete duplicate messages', the original one is apparently
> > > removed, and the remaining one is left marked unread. This seems
> > > wrong, since I've already actually read the message. Am I
> > > missing something? Is this behavior configurable somehow?
> >
> > In my case when I have 2 duplicate message .. one "marked" read and
> > one marked "unread" the "Delete Duplicate Messages" function remove
> > the message that is marked "unread".
> >
> > There's no option for this behavior, but I think is better to remove
> > the message marked as "unread".
> >
> > My +1
>
> So we both agree that removing the unread one is "the right thing".
> My Sylpheed sometimes removes the read one and sometimes the unread
> one. After playing around a bit, it seems that my Sylpheed always
> removes the one whose file (I use MH mailboxes) has the earlier
> timestamp. Can anyone verify this? If so, is there a consensus on
> whether this is 'correct' or not?
In the current implementation of 'Delete duplicated messages', it is
dependent on the order of the summary view. The undermost one will
always remain.
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y at kcn.ne.jp>
More information about the Sylpheed
mailing list