[sylpheed:30504] Re: LibSylph 1.0.0 released

[Hiroyuki Yamamoto]

Hello,

On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 12:05:08 +0100
"Ricardo Mones" <ricardo.mones at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 12/4/06, Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y at kcn.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:29:22 +0200
> > Cristian Secară <orice at secarica.ro> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:50 +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> > >
> > > > LibSylph 1.0.0 (stable) has been released.
> > >
> > > The language packs from LibSylph and Sylpheed will remain like
> > > they are today ?
> > > Which one overrides the other one ?
> > > If I make a correction to the language file from Sylpheed it will
> > > be overwritten by the one from LibSylph, or if I make a
> > > correction to the language file from LibSylph it will be
> > > overwritten by the one from Sylpheed ?
> >
> > Currently each message catalog file is completely separeted as
> > sylpheed.mo and libsylph.mo, so they don't overwrite each other.
> 
>   Are libsylph strings not a subset of sylpheed ones?
>   IOW, it's required to update both separately or does suffice
> updating the sylpheed translation for keeping libsylph updated?

Libsylph strings are generated from sylpheed ones.
They are not automatically synched (until Sylpheed becomes the new
libsylph-based). So it's required to update both separatedly for now.

-- 
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y at kcn.ne.jp>