[sylpheed:30485] Re: LibSylph 1.0.0 released

Ricardo Mones ricardo.mones at gmail.com
Mon Dec 4 20:05:08 JST 2006


Hello,

On 12/4/06, Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y at kcn.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:29:22 +0200
> Cristian Secară <orice at secarica.ro> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:19:50 +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> >
> > > LibSylph 1.0.0 (stable) has been released.
> >
> > The language packs from LibSylph and Sylpheed will remain like
> > they are today ?
> > Which one overrides the other one ?
> > If I make a correction to the language file from Sylpheed it will be
> > overwritten by the one from LibSylph, or if I make a correction to the
> > language file from LibSylph it will be overwritten by the one from
> > Sylpheed ?
>
> Currently each message catalog file is completely separeted as
> sylpheed.mo and libsylph.mo, so they don't overwrite each other.

  Are libsylph strings not a subset of sylpheed ones?
  IOW, it's required to update both separately or does suffice
updating the sylpheed translation for keeping libsylph updated?

  regards,
-- 
Ricardo Mones.
[NOTE: gmail adds a REPLY-TO header]


More information about the Sylpheed mailing list