[sylpheed:35847] Re: Sylpheed

cgw993 at aol.com cgw993 at aol.com
Sat Nov 2 05:08:05 JST 2013

I am not giving Sylpheed a hard time at all.  I would like to know how the
licensing concepts work in general.  

-----Original Message-----
From: sylpheed-bounces at sraoss.jp [mailto:sylpheed-bounces at sraoss.jp] On
Behalf Of foxtail at gmx.fr
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 9:37 AM
To: sylpheed at sraoss.jp
Subject: [sylpheed:35843] Re: Sylpheed

I'd much prefer blasting the NSA to space and let them handle mysterious Pac
man invaders than giving a hard time to Sylpheed..

-----Message d'origine-----
De : sm0oojzz+sylph at fastimap.com
Envoyé : 01/11/2013 15:53
À : sylpheed at sraoss.jp
Objet : [sylpheed:35842] Re: Sylpheed

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:47:30 -0700 cgw993 wrote...

> I like Sylpheed.   My only concern is that some of the code is non free I
> guess.   I am hesitant to invest in learning new software unless I know
> certain I am not being spied on, that features are not forced on me 
> whenever the developer feels like.  Non free code often can allow this.
> Thx for reading.   Just wanted to rant about Outlook. Microsoft sucks.

If you have concerns about how a developer designs his application, you have
the option of designing or refining your own.  Find an open source MUA and
tweak it to your hearts content.  If this is beyond your abilities, I guess
you have to live with what is available to you for **FREE**.

More information about the Sylpheed mailing list