[sylpheed:35455] Fw: Re: support for imap idle?

[Bruce Bowler]

poking a stick into an old thread...

Any updates on if/when imap idle might be available?

	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMAP_IDLE

Bruce





Begin forwarded message:

Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:32:14 -0600
From: Ron <ron at skullsecurity.net>
To: sylpheed at sraoss.jp
Subject: [sylpheed:33639] Re: support for imap idle?


On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:26:40 +0100 Frantz de Germain
<Frantz.de-Germain at info.univ-angers.fr> wrote:

> Le Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:35:35 +0100
> Jan Stępień <jan at stepien.cc> écrivait:
> 
> > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:00:05 +0100
> > Eike Nicklas <lists at ephys.de> wrote:
> > > I know this has been requested before, but IMHO support for imap
> > > idle would make sylpheed even better. I am mentioning it again,
> > > since it might be easier to implement now that sylpheed uses
> > > threads anyway (that is just a guess, I am not an expert on these
> > > things).
> > 
> > I strongly second this suggestion. 
> 
> Me too :-)
> 
> Regards
> 
> -- 
> Frantz de Germain
I actually know a couple people who say that the lack of IDLE is why
they don't use Sylpheed. And I can see their point -- polling is so
last century. :)

-- 
Ron Bowes
http://www.skullsecurity.org


-- 
+-------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
Bruce Bowler        | Don't take life too seriously, it's not permanent
1.202.747.3255 x503 | 
bbowler at bigelow.org | - Anon
+-------------------+---------------------------------------------------+