[sylpheed:35291] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sylpheed 3.2beta8 released

Gene Goldenfeld genegold at fastmail.fm
Mon Jun 11 09:40:03 JST 2012


Sure enough, the install wizard for the Installer version of beta8
shows it as beta7, although at the completed install box it shows as
8.  When the new one is opened, it shows as beta7 and wants to update.

Gene


On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:29:08 -0600
Gene Goldenfeld <genegold at fastmail.fm> wrote:

> It looks like the problem is related to the sylpheed.exe version
> number or how Sylpheed is reading it. The file version is 3.2.0.1135
> and has remained the same all the way through, whether the app itself
> shows as beta8 or beta7. Just now I tried copying in the patch again
> and Sylpheed first opened as beta8, but then a moment later as beta7
> and asked for update.  The file version number never changed.
> 
> Gene
> 
> 
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:53:56 -0600
> Gene Goldenfeld <genegold at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> 
> > Something weird is going on here with beta8 (Win 7x64).  I installed
> > the Win 32 patch three times on June 7, copying the folders and
> > files to the existing install like I always do, and each time
> > Sylpheed reverted back to beta7 right after. The last time held
> > until just now, three days later, and it's done it again. Not sure
> > what to make of it.
> > 
> > Gene
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:43:05 +0900
> > Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y at kcn.ne.jp> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Sylpheed 3.2beta8 has been released.
> > > 
> > > http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/en/news.html
> > > http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/en/download.html#development


More information about the Sylpheed mailing list