[sylpheed:35032] Re: Snarl and Sylpheed for Windows: which command to execute when new messages arrived? Need advice.

[HAYASHI Kentaro]

Hello,


On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:12 PM,  <pn361529 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> HAYASHI Kentaro <kenhys at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I implemented tiny experimental plugin - sylnotify.
>
> wow, you just did that because of this thread or were you developing it
> for yourself already? ;D
>
> Thank you very much either way :)!
>
>> I do not know what you want in detail, and can not ensure this one
>> work well, but it may make sense as sample for you.
>>
>> https://github.com/kenhys/sylpheed-notify/downloads
>
> Your README there
> https://github.com/kenhys/sylpheed-notify/blob/master/README
> says:
>
> "This plugin is not stable and generate notification when you receive
> new mail.
> So, you received 100 mail, then sylnotify generate 100 growl
> notification!"
>
> Does that mean, that if Sylpheed does 1 poll for new messages and there
> are 100 new messages within that poll, that there will be 100
> notifications?
>
> Or does that mean, that for 100 polls, there will be 100 notifications
> (if with every poll there were new messages)?
>

the former. this plugin execute command every add-msg signal emitted
by Sylpheed.

>> it use Growl for windows and growlnotify instead of Snarl.
>
> Your README also mentions:
>
> "* support Snarl(SNP/GNTP/HeySnarl)
>  * support Growl(GNTP)"
>
> under "TODO".
>
> Is that something that will be implemented soon or will that take
> longer?
>
> And again, thank you very much :).
>

In version 0.2.0, support Snarl by Snarl_CMD.exe.
That is enough as a proof of concept,
so there are few insentives now(supporting Snarl SNP,GNTP, Growl GNTP).





-- 
HAYASHI Kentaro <kenhys at gmail.com>