[sylpheed:33639] Re: support for imap idle?
ron at skullsecurity.net
Wed Feb 10 05:32:14 JST 2010
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 11:26:40 +0100 Frantz de Germain <Frantz.de-Germain at info.univ-angers.fr> wrote:
> Le Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:35:35 +0100
> Jan Stępień <jan at stepien.cc> écrivait:
> > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:00:05 +0100
> > Eike Nicklas <lists at ephys.de> wrote:
> > > I know this has been requested before, but IMHO support for imap idle
> > > would make sylpheed even better. I am mentioning it again, since it
> > > might be easier to implement now that sylpheed uses threads anyway
> > > (that is just a guess, I am not an expert on these things).
> > I strongly second this suggestion.
> Me too :-)
> Frantz de Germain
I actually know a couple people who say that the lack of IDLE is why they don't use Sylpheed. And I can see their point -- polling is so last century. :)
More information about the Sylpheed