[sylpheed:32004] Re: Better Junk Filter Option For Win32?

Neil Smith neil_smith at nerdshack.com
Fri Jan 4 18:03:24 JST 2008

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:00:02 +0900
sylpheed-request at sraoss.jp wrote:

> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:21:10 +0000
> From: Scott J Mathieson <uberkorp at gmail.com>
> Subject: [sylpheed:31994] Better Junk Filter Option For Win32?
> 	BSFilter Is	Slow!
> To: sylpheed at sraoss.jp
> Message-ID: <20080102072110.fe8256c9.uberkorp at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Hey,
> Are there any recommendations for a faster junk filter on win32, or
> linkage to more info, can't seem to find anything.
> Cheers
> -- 
> Scott Mathieson <uberkorp at gmail.com>

I've given up on bsfilter not because of speed, but because of it's
poor accuracy.  I've gone back to my previous solution which was to
use K9 from http://www.keir.net/k9.html.  It doesn't integrate
into sylpheed, but it works well.  Accuracy for me is miles ahead of
bsfilter, just remember if you try it to give it a reasonable amount of
good and bad mails to train it with.


More information about the Sylpheed mailing list