[pgpool-hackers: 369] Re: "On memory" vs. "In memory"

Huang Bambo bambo.huang at gmail.com
Sun Oct 6 19:49:11 JST 2013

Hi, Tatsuo,
My question is that are there any chances to use other kind of query cache
in the future, such as SSD based cache.
If so, in memory cache should keep, I think.

Bambo Huang

On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at postgresql.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> We use a term "on memory" for the name of the query cache
> system. However sometime ago, Bruce Momjian has pointed out that "on
> memory" is not correct and should be changed to "in memory".  I also
> remember that Oracle's new feature "In-Memory option to database 12c".
> So my question is, should we entirely replace "on memory" with "in
> memory"? Or, considering that we have removed the disk based query
> cache system, we should just remove "on memory" from the term "on
> memory query cache" and call it simply "query cache"?
> Suggestions and opinions are welcome.
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
> Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
> _______________________________________________
> pgpool-hackers mailing list
> pgpool-hackers at pgpool.net
> http://www.pgpool.net/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/attachments/20131006/5ecdcf24/attachment.html>

More information about the pgpool-hackers mailing list