<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi, Tatsuo,<br></div>My question is that are there any chances to use other kind of query cache in the future, such as SSD based cache.<br>If so, in memory cache should keep, I think.<br><br>Bambo Huang<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ishii@postgresql.org" target="_blank">ishii@postgresql.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
We use a term "on memory" for the name of the query cache<br>
system. However sometime ago, Bruce Momjian has pointed out that "on<br>
memory" is not correct and should be changed to "in memory". I also<br>
remember that Oracle's new feature "In-Memory option to database 12c".<br>
<br>
So my question is, should we entirely replace "on memory" with "in<br>
memory"? Or, considering that we have removed the disk based query<br>
cache system, we should just remove "on memory" from the term "on<br>
memory query cache" and call it simply "query cache"?<br>
<br>
Suggestions and opinions are welcome.<br>
--<br>
Tatsuo Ishii<br>
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan<br>
English: <a href="http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php" target="_blank">http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php</a><br>
Japanese: <a href="http://www.sraoss.co.jp" target="_blank">http://www.sraoss.co.jp</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
pgpool-hackers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:pgpool-hackers@pgpool.net">pgpool-hackers@pgpool.net</a><br>
<a href="http://www.pgpool.net/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers" target="_blank">http://www.pgpool.net/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>