[sylpheed:36023] Re: GnuPG Support: Encrypt to self in Sent Items

Adam Jensen hanzer at riseup.net
Fri Mar 7 09:01:44 JST 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 23:33:24 +0100
Tim Drub <tim.drub at hacky.eu> wrote:

> Well, I guess PGP/Mime is the way to go today as it is the 
> recommendation. I do would say that many smaller problems are
> addressed by it that inline couldn't really solve.
> 

Some mailing lists remove Mime attachments; an inline (ASCII
armored format) signature might sometimes seem like visual
clutter but it serves its purpose.

> Anyway, I didn't want to start a discussion about what is the
> better of the two. I was just wondering why inline support in
> Sylpheed is incomplete. Sending ASCII armored works but
> receiving such messages are not recognized as being encrypted.
> 

If it wouldn't cause any bloat, it would be nice to have
"encrypt to self" available as an option and automatic inline
(ASCII armor) decryption and signature-checking on by default. 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (OpenBSD)
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=UL7v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Sylpheed mailing list