[sylpheed:36074] Re: (no subject)

[Javier]

> On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 00:31:33 -0700
> <cgw993 at aol.com> wrote:
> 
> > I just wanted to give some feedback for Sylpheed. I am still using
> > ...
> >  On this mailing list I do not see a lot of people giving a thanks or
> > positive feedback for this software.  So Hiroyuki, if you are the
> > creator of Sylpheed or largely responsible for it,  then "well done,
> > good work, Keep it up and thanks".
> > 
> > The only change I would make to Sylpheed is to have the ability to
> > disable the confirmation box when  a user wants to sent an email with
> > an empty subject line.  I know I differ from a lot of users on this,
> > but I do not find subject lines to be useful or even a good idea.  If
> > someone takes the time to personally write me an email, I open it and
> > read it.  I agree that subject lines are great to help others
> > organize your sent emails (NSA, AOL, Google, Random Servers, Etc).
>  


Hi, Gene, let me post my reply from your message as the messages from
cgw993 in this thread (never happened previously), maybe it was a
coincidence, but with subject or not they didn't arrive to my mail
inbox :-?

And that's the reason of this reply, do you (all) had knowledge of
this "un-subjected" mail from your inbox, or from the web archive of
the mailing list?

If was only with the mailing list maybe you have there an undesired
annoying behavior of why mails shouldn't be without a subject. I
agree with other posters. I find annoying mails without subject.

About the privacy of subjects, first, this is a public list, and,
second, with private mails you can be more concise and maybe
confusing on subjects. Also, I answer to your doubt: no, PGP/GnuPG
doesn't encrypt subject.

The warning is to keep a bit of deference with the addressee.

Regards :)