[sylpheed:35848] Re: Sylpheed
cgw993 at aol.com
cgw993 at aol.com
Sat Nov 2 05:13:07 JST 2013
Thank you for the links, I am checking them out now to find the answer.
-----Original Message-----
From: sylpheed-bounces at sraoss.jp [mailto:sylpheed-bounces at sraoss.jp] On
Behalf Of tristan
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 1:06 PM
To: sylpheed at sraoss.jp
Subject: [sylpheed:35846] Re: Sylpheed
On 01/11/2013 20:57, cgw993 at aol.com wrote:
> I am concerned about non free software as everything should be. I am
> getting clarification on what LGPL means currently. For example, if
> you have a program that contains two parts, part A and part B with
> these licenses
>
> Part A - LPGL
> Part B - GPL
>
> Does there exist any non free software in the program? If not, then why
> doesnt the program just combine parts A and B and have one license
> that is GPL? I may not be understanding the GNU GPL licensing concepts
correctly.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sylpheed-bounces at sraoss.jp [mailto:sylpheed-bounces at sraoss.jp]
> On Behalf Of sm0oojzz+sylph at fastimap.com
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 7:53 AM
> To: sylpheed at sraoss.jp
> Subject: [sylpheed:35842] Re: Sylpheed
>
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:47:30 -0700 cgw993 wrote...
>
>
>> I like Sylpheed. My only concern is that some of the code is non free I
>> guess. I am hesitant to invest in learning new software unless I know
> for
>> certain I am not being spied on, that features are not forced on me
>> whenever the developer feels like. Non free code often can allow this.
>>
>> Thx for reading. Just wanted to rant about Outlook. Microsoft sucks.
>>
>>
>
> If you have concerns about how a developer designs his application,
> you have the option of designing or refining your own. Find an open
> source MUA and tweak it to your hearts content. If this is beyond
> your abilities, I guess you have to live with what is available to you for
**FREE**.
>
> Your questions are legitimate
https://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#GPL
* What does "GPL" stand for?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatDoesGPLStandFor>
* Does free software mean using the GPL?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesFreeSoftwareMeanUsingTheGPL>
* Why should I use the GNU GPL rather than other free software
licenses? <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyUseGPL>
* Does all GNU software use the GNU GPL as its license?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesAllGNUSoftwareUseTheGNUGPLAsIt
sLicense>
* Does using the GPL for a program make it GNU software?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesUsingTheGPLForAProgramMakeItGN
USoftware>
* Can I use the GPL for something other than software?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOtherThanSoftware>
* Why don't you use the GPL for manuals?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyNotGPLForManuals>
* Are there translations of the GPL into other languages?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLTranslations>
* Why are some GNU libraries released under the ordinary GPL rather
than the Lesser GPL?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhySomeGPLAndNotLGPL>
* Who has the power to enforce the GPL?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhoHasThePower>
* Why does the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted
programs assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a
GPL'ed program, should I do this, too? If so, how?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AssignCopyright>
* Can I modify the GPL and make a modified license?
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ModifyGPL>
* Why did you decide to write the GNU Affero GPLv3 as a separate
license? <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#SeparateAffero>
More information about the Sylpheed
mailing list