[sylpheed:31624] Re: Question
Frank Lanitz
linux at partysoke.de
Tue Aug 7 18:50:18 JST 2007
Hi Nicholas, hi list
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:05:33 +0700
"N.Novozhilov" <nna at darim.com> wrote:
> Second mail from second pair was maid as reply to the firs (possibly),
> but have no relation to one.
A typically problem of hijacked threads inside ML (or i.g. a user, that
doesn't know the difference between replay and new topic).
> So threading MUST BE CONFIGURABLE, I think. And at least, must be item
> "Thread by Subj" as most usable.
This feature is only needed by communication with broken MUA like MS
Outlook, that doesn't support "In-Replay-to" and/or "References"
correct.
Since I'm getting a big number of mails with "no subject"-subjects, I'm
not sure, if I really want to thread them....
Frank
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/attachments/20070807/5e99f168/attachment.bin
More information about the Sylpheed
mailing list