[sylpheed:30308] Re: junk filtering not automatic
hiro-y at kcn.ne.jp
Tue Oct 31 14:31:25 JST 2006
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:52:37 +0000
Paul <claws at thewildbeast.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:47:30 -0500
> Seth Kurtzberg <seth at cql.com> wrote:
> > Hmm., that's odd. When I was working on IMAP filtering, there was
> > a huge demand.
> > I suspect that the number of imap users is low compared to the
> > number of pop users.
> > However, I invite others to comment. If everyone believes it's not
> > a desirable feature, then I won't waste time with it.
> I'm not saying it is undesirable, and, more importantly, I don't speak
> for Hiroyuki. Perhaps, now, he will accept a patch for this feature.
I know there are many demands for IMAP filtering, but I haven't
implemented it because 1) I haven't come up with an efficient
implementation yet, 2) I haven't been provided a patch for this feature
yet, and 3) I don't heavily use IMAP now. Of course I might accept a
patch for the feature once I get it.
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hiro-y at kcn.ne.jp>
More information about the Sylpheed