From mailinglists at lucassen.org  Tue Feb  2 17:12:51 2016
From: mailinglists at lucassen.org (richard lucassen)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:12:51 +0100
Subject: [sylpheed:36418] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sylpheed 3.5 released
In-Reply-To: <20160125172956.298a593aa0a85f37fbc55999@sraoss.co.jp>
References: <20160125172956.298a593aa0a85f37fbc55999@sraoss.co.jp>
Message-ID: <20160202091251.193f001354bb318692285a0b@lucassen.org>

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:29:56 +0900
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <yamamoto at sraoss.co.jp> wrote:

> The new stable version Sylpheed 3.5 has been released.

3.5.0 build 1169 works, build 1170 shows this:

** LibSylph-WARNING: SSL_connect() failed with error 1, ret = -1
(error:14082174:SSL routines:ssl3_check_cert_and_algorithm:dh key too
small)

I have to switch off TLS for IMAP, then it works again, but I don't
think that's a good idea ;-)

I tested this on two machines: Debian Testing. Apparently something has
changed in between. I have no idea if it's a Sylpheed issue or some
other package. Anyone a hint?

R.

-- 
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/

From mailinglists at lucassen.org  Tue Feb  2 17:21:39 2016
From: mailinglists at lucassen.org (richard lucassen)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:21:39 +0100
Subject: [sylpheed:36419] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sylpheed 3.5 released
In-Reply-To: <20160202091251.193f001354bb318692285a0b@lucassen.org>
References: <20160125172956.298a593aa0a85f37fbc55999@sraoss.co.jp>
	<20160202091251.193f001354bb318692285a0b@lucassen.org>
Message-ID: <20160202092139.63cf358208d3e555cde12f5d@lucassen.org>

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:12:51 +0100
richard lucassen <mailinglists at lucassen.org> wrote:

> I tested this on two machines: Debian Testing. Apparently something
> has changed in between. I have no idea if it's a Sylpheed issue or
> some other package. Anyone a hint?

Downgrade does not change anything. Must be something else.

-- 
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/

From mailinglists at lucassen.org  Tue Feb  2 17:47:32 2016
From: mailinglists at lucassen.org (richard lucassen)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:47:32 +0100
Subject: [sylpheed:36420] [SOLVED] Sylpheed 3.5 dh param too small
In-Reply-To: <20160202092139.63cf358208d3e555cde12f5d@lucassen.org>
References: <20160125172956.298a593aa0a85f37fbc55999@sraoss.co.jp>
	<20160202091251.193f001354bb318692285a0b@lucassen.org>
	<20160202092139.63cf358208d3e555cde12f5d@lucassen.org>
Message-ID: <20160202094732.c3ce58d2012414617dc254b3@lucassen.org>

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:21:39 +0100
richard lucassen <mailinglists at lucassen.org> wrote:

> Downgrade does not change anything. Must be something else.

On my courier-IMAP server I had to generate a new DH key:

openssl dhparam -out dhparam.pem 2048

R.

-- 
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/

From siefke_listen at web.de  Wed Feb 17 21:08:41 2016
From: siefke_listen at web.de (Silvio Siefke)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:08:41 +0100
Subject: [sylpheed:36421] Delete mails without thread
Message-ID: <20160217130841.173889affd20bbdc7720ec48@web.de>

Hello,

Is there a way to delete emails without thread? That is painful 
when have to do this thousands emails by hand.

Thank you for help
Silvio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/attachments/20160217/7004e9d2/attachment.sig>

From vitsen at gmx.com  Thu Feb 18 07:20:40 2016
From: vitsen at gmx.com (vitsen at gmx.com)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:20:40 +0100
Subject: [sylpheed:36422] Advantages of Sylpheed over Claws Mail
Message-ID: <trinity-7b42214b-5b28-4fc5-8c90-ca99c48d89f1-1455747640077@3capp-mailcom-bs04>

Hi

currently I am not a Sylpheed user (my client is Claws Mail), but I am curious about Sylpheed. Usually the forks of a software project are more advanced than the original project, and this may be the case with Claws Mail, but I have noticed that in spite of everything Sylpheed keeps developing and improving.

I know that my question may appear like trolling, but it is not.
Basically, I was wondering, why would one prefer Sylpheed over Claws Mail? What are the advantages? I am a Claws Mail user, what can Sylpheed offer me to convince me to make the switch from Claws Mail?
Lastly, does Sylpheed have some philosophy or development guidelines that make it substantially different from Claws Mail?

By the way, I found out that Sylpheed is respected in the Fedora community and elsewhere, so this grabbed my attention and made me sit up.

I thank you in advance

Victor

From capsthorne at yahoo.co.uk  Thu Feb 18 07:45:41 2016
From: capsthorne at yahoo.co.uk (Geoff)
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:45:41 +0000
Subject: [sylpheed:36423] Re: Advantages of Sylpheed over Claws Mail
In-Reply-To: <trinity-7b42214b-5b28-4fc5-8c90-ca99c48d89f1-1455747640077@3capp-mailcom-bs04>
References: <trinity-7b42214b-5b28-4fc5-8c90-ca99c48d89f1-1455747640077@3capp-mailcom-bs04>
Message-ID: <20160217224541.2c033e083a4757b45c2e197f@yahoo.co.uk>

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:20:40 +0100
vitsen at gmx.com wrote:

> Basically, I was wondering, why would one prefer Sylpheed over Claws Mail?
> What are the advantages?

This may not be a very good answer, but my own reason is that I have used
Sylpheed almost from its beginning. I switched to Linux in 2000 and found that
it was the best e-mail client for my needs then available. I have always
compiled from source and enjoyed watching it progress. It does everything I
need and, although it may sound rather old-fashioned, I do feel a certain
loyalty to software and Developer that have both served me so well.

Geoff

From steve at sohara.org  Thu Feb 18 16:35:43 2016
From: steve at sohara.org (Steve O'Hara-Smith)
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:35:43 +0000
Subject: [sylpheed:36424] Re: Advantages of Sylpheed over Claws Mail
In-Reply-To: <trinity-7b42214b-5b28-4fc5-8c90-ca99c48d89f1-1455747640077@3capp-mailcom-bs04>
References: <trinity-7b42214b-5b28-4fc5-8c90-ca99c48d89f1-1455747640077@3capp-mailcom-bs04>
Message-ID: <20160218073543.ce2c886eb27424520116f8c9@sohara.org>

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:20:40 +0100
vitsen at gmx.com wrote:

> Hi
> 
> currently I am not a Sylpheed user (my client is Claws Mail), but I am
> curious about Sylpheed. Usually the forks of a software project are more
> advanced than the original project, and this may be the case with Claws
> Mail, but I have noticed that in spite of everything Sylpheed keeps
> developing and improving.

	Claws has more features, Sylpheed remains light. That as far as I
can see sums up the difference between the projects.

> I know that my question may appear like trolling, but it is not.
> Basically, I was wondering, why would one prefer Sylpheed over Claws
> Mail? What are the advantages? I am a Claws Mail user, what can Sylpheed
> offer me to convince me to make the switch from Claws Mail? Lastly, does
> Sylpheed have some philosophy or development guidelines that make it
> substantially different from Claws Mail?

	I have been using Sylpheed since the very early days (0.3) before
the Claws fork happened, it has never given me any trouble. I have tried
Claws a few times, perhaps I've been unlucky, but every time I've tried
Claws it gave me some kind of trouble.

	As for whether you should make the switch - try it and see, but if
you're happy with what you have then I'd say stick with it. If not then
look for something that eases whatever pain points you have, be guided by
whatever it is that makes you unhappy with what you have.

> By the way, I found out that Sylpheed is respected in the Fedora
> community and elsewhere, so this grabbed my attention and made me sit up.

	Sylpheed has earned my respect by being efficient and reliable, it
does more than I need so extra features are not interesting.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve at sohara.org>


From rodperson at rodperson.com  Thu Feb 18 19:50:59 2016
From: rodperson at rodperson.com (Rod Person)
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:50:59 -0500
Subject: [sylpheed:36425] Re: Advantages of Sylpheed over Claws Mail
In-Reply-To: <trinity-7b42214b-5b28-4fc5-8c90-ca99c48d89f1-1455747640077@3capp-mailcom-bs04>
References: <trinity-7b42214b-5b28-4fc5-8c90-ca99c48d89f1-1455747640077@3capp-mailcom-bs04>
Message-ID: <1455792659.54598.51.camel@rodperson.com>

On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 23:20 +0100, vitsen at gmx.com wrote:
> Hi
> 
> currently I am not a Sylpheed user (my client is Claws Mail), but I
> am curious about Sylpheed. Usually the forks of a software project
> are more advanced than the original project, and this may be the case
> with Claws Mail, but I have noticed that in spite of everything
> Sylpheed keeps developing and improving.
> 
> I know that my question may appear like trolling, but it is not.
> Basically, I was wondering, why would one prefer Sylpheed over Claws
> Mail? What are the advantages? I am a Claws Mail user, what can
> Sylpheed offer me to convince me to make the switch from Claws Mail?
> Lastly, does Sylpheed have some philosophy or development guidelines
> that make it substantially different from Claws Mail?
> 

I've used both claws and Sylpheed in the past, personally I prefer
everything in Sylpheed over the Claws, but If you absolutely need to
send or reply to an HTML email and keep the HTML formatting then Claws
wins.  That was the only reason I had to switch back to Claws because I
had to send and reply to people in HTML who could care less how bad
HTML is for send email.



> By the way, I found out that Sylpheed is respected in the Fedora
> community and elsewhere, so this grabbed my attention and made me sit
> up.
> 
> I thank you in advance
> 
> Victor

-- 
Rod
http://www.rodperson.com
He who knows himself to be one way and pretends it is another way is a thief who robs his own soul.
? The Mahabharata?????Sakuntala 25


From joe.koenig at gmx.de  Mon Feb 29 23:10:40 2016
From: joe.koenig at gmx.de (Joe Koenig)
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:10:40 +0100
Subject: [sylpheed:36426] add phone number o addresbook entry
Message-ID: <20160229151040.269a9eac04147c7034bd39dc@gmx.de>

Hi.

How is one supposed to add additional data to a given addressbook
entry?  E.g.: add a phone number to an existing addresbook entry.

I.e.: I'd go 
Tools
 --> Address Book 
   --> Auto-registered Addresses
     --> right-click
       --> 'Edit'

Well, I'm stumped from here on.
I did try "User Attributes -> Add", of course.  To no avail,  It
didn't stick.

Regards Joe

$ sylpheed --version
   Sylpheed version 3.5.0
$ uname -a
Linux Jessi 4.4.1-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 3 13:12:33 UTC 2016
x86_64 GNU/Linux