[sylpheed:34742] Re: Sylpheed v Claws

[wwp]

Hello James,


On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:46:43 +0100 James Freer <jrjfreer at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've just been reading some of the history between these two apps. For
> a while i gather that Claws was undergoing more development than
> Sylpheed and thus less stable. The intention was to keep Sylpheed more
> stable and less feature rich.
> 
> Is that still the case? I've belong to this list for a few weeks and
> it would seem that Sylpheed is a more stable product.

This is no longer the case, for years. Claws Mail (formerly
Sylpheed-Claws) has split and become a separate, not the bleeding-edge
version of Sylpheed a long time ago. I don't think Sylpheed is more
stable. Now it's up to you to compare features and differences.


Regards,

-- 
wwp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/attachments/20110824/8463dc59/attachment.sig>