<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ishii@sraoss.co.jp" target="_blank">ishii@sraoss.co.jp</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Usama,<br>
<br>
I have created WIP patch for the per node health check feature which<br>
will be in Pgpool-II 3.7.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.pgpool.net/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/2017-March/002213.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.pgpool.net/<wbr>pipermail/pgpool-hackers/2017-<wbr>March/002213.html</a><br>
<br>
This is a WIP patch and is lacking important features including per<br>
node health check parameters in pgpool.conf. It just moves the health<br>
checking from pgpool main process to new per node health check worker<br>
process. Before going further, I would appreciate if you could confirm<br>
that my patch does not break anything related to watchdog.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi Ishii-San.</div><div>The changes in the attached WIP patch looks good and has no issues with watchdog.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div>Best regards</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Best regards,<br>
--<br>
Tatsuo Ishii<br>
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan<br>
English: <a href="http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_<wbr>en.php</a><br>
Japanese:<a href="http://www.sraoss.co.jp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.sraoss.co.<wbr>jp</a><br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
pgpool-hackers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:pgpool-hackers@pgpool.net">pgpool-hackers@pgpool.net</a><br>
<a href="http://www.pgpool.net/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.pgpool.net/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/pgpool-hackers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>