<div dir="ltr">Hi Ishii-San<div><br></div><div>Any thoughts on this one?</div><div><br></div><div>Kind regards</div><div>Muhammad Usama</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Muhammad Usama <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:m.usama@gmail.com" target="_blank">m.usama@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi</div><div><br></div>At the time de-escalation from the master watchdog node, Pgpool-II should not perform the ping test to verify if the VIP is successfully brought down or not.<div><br><div>The reason is, if the newly elected master watchdog node acquires the VIP while the resigning Pgpool-II node is still performing the de-escalation steps or doing the ping test on VIP. The resigning Pgpool-II will falsely assume that it has failed to bring down the delegate IP, after getting the positive ping result from the new master node that has already acquired that VIP.</div><div><br></div></div><div>Comments and suggestions are welcome. </div><div><br></div><div>Kind regards</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>Muhammad Usama</div></font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>