[pgpool-hackers: 3521] Re: [PATCH] Feature: Support for CRL (Certificate Revocation List)

[Umar Hayat]

Hi Tatsuo,
Any update for last patch?
I will be sending more patches in the same area of SSL ( for few other
features ) and the those patches might create conflict on merge.

Regards,
Umar Hayat
Principal Software Engineer
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:39 PM Umar Hayat <m.umarkiani at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tatsuo,
> Please find the attached updated patch with following changes:
> 1. Updated the description of '*ssl_crl_file'* configuration variable.
> 2. Updated test case '024.cert_auth' which verify valid CRL and invalid
> CRL ( CRL with revocation entry )
>
> Regards,
> Umar Hayat
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:43 AM Tatsuo Ishii <ishii at sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>
>> > I just followed the description pattern used for other ssl variables. We
>> > can use PostgreSQL doc if we remove following two line from that:
>> > "Relative paths are relative to the data
>> > directory. This parameter can only be set in the postgresql.conf file
>> > or on the server command line.
>> > "
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>> > - It would be nice to include regression test patch. See
>> >>   src/test/023.ssl_connection for an example.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Sure, I will create and send test patch in src/test/023.ssl_connection.
>> > I will try to generate CRL file for existing certification file in this
>> > this test. If thats not possible, then I have to generate new
>> certification
>> > and CRL file.
>>
>> Thank you. Looking forward to the new patch.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Tatsuo Ishii
>> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
>> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/attachments/20200227/b31147af/attachment.html>