[pgpool-hackers: 1552] Re: Feature Request with Patch

[Brian Faherty]

I can agree that keeping things consistent is a good idea. I'm busy this
week, but I should have time next week to code that up. Any other
suggestion you want me to get while I"m doing that, because I don't think I
have used all the commands. I'll look though the doc's to see what I find
as well, but I wanted to ask in case there is something specific you want
me to do.


On May 9, 2016 3:52 AM, "Tatsuo Ishii" <ishii at postgresql.org> wrote:

> > Hey everybody,
> >   I use pgpool and I noticed that pcp_node_info usually requires that I
> > have the pgpool docs open in order to interpret the output. As a result I
> > would like to propose a '-r --readable' option (-h for human-readable is
> > taken by host). I posted the small patch needed to do this
> > http://www.pgpool.net/mantisbt/view.php?id=192 . I am willing to do more
> > work on this if it is requested. Let me know what the opinion on this is.
>
> If we were going to change pcp_node_info, we might want to change other
> places for consistency sake (for example, "show pool_nodes"). What do
> you think?
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/attachments/20160509/8cfa1094/attachment-0001.html>