[pgpool-hackers: 1036] Re: Support policy

Joshua D. Drake jd at commandprompt.com
Fri Sep 4 00:34:32 JST 2015


On 09/02/2015 03:51 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> On 09/01/2015 02:32 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>> Now that we are going to release 3.5 this fall, I would like to define
>>> our official community support policy.
>>>
>>> My thought is, support will be back to five releases, which is same as
>>> what we currently do (supported branches are: 3.4, 3.3, 3,2, 3.1 and
>>> 3.0).
>>>
>>> That means when 3.5 is out, the support for 3.0 will be dropped.
>>
>> I think this can be a little too fluid. What if one release takes 3
>> years to get out? Sure, it isn't currently likely but still.
>
> Ok, let's say 5 years, instead of 5 versions. However, we may continue
> the support a little bit longer than 5 years. For example pgpool-II
> 3.0 was out in September 2010. If we strictly apply the "5 years
> rule", we will drop the support this month but I don't think we can
> make 3.5 out this month (probably October or November, instead). I
> would like to continue the support for 3.0 until 3.5 is out.

I like the 5 years, which mimics PostgreSQL's support policy but why do 
we want to support 3.0 until 3.5 is out? We have 3.4,3.3,3.2,3.1?

Sincerely,

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.


More information about the pgpool-hackers mailing list