<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Il giorno mar 29 ott 2019 alle ore 23:57 Tatsuo Ishii <<a href="mailto:ishii@sraoss.co.jp">ishii@sraoss.co.jp</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Thanks. I confirmed that pgpool at proxy2 and proxy3 did not detect<br>
the failure of postgres1. So watchdog at proxy1 did not get<br>
consensus. I suspect the way you stopped postgres was something special<br>
(not ordinary shutdown by using pg_ctl). Can you elaborate how you<br>
stopped postgres1?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I used "service postgresql stop" on postgres1. And then "start" to start it again.</div><div><br></div><div>So I have one question: why you ask me this? Does this mean that if PostgreSQL would be killed in an "abnormal way" (like kernel hang, memory or something else not made by user) the failover does not work? </div></div></div>