<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra">Hi Carlos,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Can you please share the pgpool log and pgpool.conf files. Since you have 7 pgpool servers in the cluster so sending the log of old Master and newly elected Master would be enough.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Thanks</div><div class="gmail_extra">Best Regards</div><div class="gmail_extra">Muhammad Usama<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
From: Carlos Cosa <<a href="mailto:carlos.cosa@yahoo.com">carlos.cosa@yahoo.com</a>><br>
Subject: [pgpool-general: 5899] Master Election - Priority<br>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 03:15:11 +0000<br>
Message-ID: <34c93dd6-5cfb-4fc7-a6ae-<wbr>28d3cacf158c@E1194759-iPhone-<wbr>iOS-1122-F17Q5M4GG5MN><br>
<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I have a system with 7 pgpool servers and 4 of them have wd_priority = 5 and the other 3 have wd_priority = 1. When I stop the Master to test the HA I have seen that sometimes a pgpool with priority 1 is elected even when there are still pgpools with priority 5 available, and I would expect to have elected one of the higher priority.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Am I missing something? Is anyway to exclude pgpool servers from master election to use them exclusively as quorums?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I am using 3.6.7<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Thank you!!<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>