[pgpool-general: 3270] Re: Execution of command failed
Tatsuo Ishii
ishii at postgresql.org
Thu Nov 13 12:37:40 JST 2014
> Thank you for your quick reply!
>
> Ah yes I misunderstood. I thought pgpool called the first stage script.
>
> Am I reading this right? It looks like pgpool_recovery is being called
> with 4 arguments, but the function only takes 3 arguments.
Yes. From pgpool-II 3.4.0, pgpool_recovery starts to accept 4
arguments. Probably your pgpool_recovery installation on PostgreSQL is
outdated. Please update.
More information about the pgpool-general
mailing list