[pgpool-general: 1810] Re: pgpool vs. pgbouncer
Tatsuo Ishii
ishii at postgresql.org
Fri May 31 00:35:16 JST 2013
> We are using both.
>
> PgBouncer is in front used as a connection pooler, then it connects to
> PgPool, which we use for load balancing only. We are using the built-in
> streaming replication.
>
> We didn't benchmark, but noticed that PgBouncer is behaving a bit better
> as connection pooler, yet it lacks the load balancing functionality of
> PgPool.
So pgbouncer is running in transaction mode? If so, how many
connections from clients to pgbouncer?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
More information about the pgpool-general
mailing list