[pgpool-general: 1049] Re: Raw failover not working as expected on pgpool-II v3.2.0

Tatsuo Ishii ishii at postgresql.org
Fri Sep 28 16:57:12 JST 2012


Oops. You are right. I have just committed fix to master and V3_2_STABLE branch.
Please grab the latest version and try it out.

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgpool2.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/V3_2_STABLE
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp

> I understand and that is what I wanted. However, I defined two nodes then started pgpool with the first node down - I expected pgpool to detect it was done and flick over to the second node.
> 
> Is that not the way it works?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:ishii at postgresql.org]
> Sent: Friday, 28 September 2012 2:49 PM
> To: Quentin White
> Cc: pgpool-general at pgpool.net
> Subject: Re: [pgpool-general: 1039] Raw failover not working as expected on pgpool-II v3.2.0
> 
>> replication_mode = off
>> master_slave_mode = off
> 
> That's the expected behavior because you turn off both modes(it is
> called "raw mode").
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
> Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
> ________________________________
> 
> This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information.
> If you are not the named recipient, please erase this communication and contact the sender immediately.
> You must not copy, use or disclose this communication, or any attachments or information contained within, without prior consent.
> 
> P Please consider the environment before printing this email
> 
> ________________________________


More information about the pgpool-general mailing list